<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LIZ McCABE dot com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lizmccabe.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lizmccabe.com</link>
	<description>the dreamchild moving through wonders wild and new</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on I suck at bets. by JackCalvin</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/61#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>JackCalvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/61#comment-125</guid>
		<description>...cha-CHING! ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;cha-CHING! ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PART XVI: The Veritas Papers by mike</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/66#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/66#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Amazing how this fits in with what I'm wrestling with in my most recent entry.  I need to chew on this a bit.  Thanks. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how this fits in with what I&#8217;m wrestling with in my most recent entry.  I need to chew on this a bit.  Thanks. <img src='http://lizmccabe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I suck at bets. by mike</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/61#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/61#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Holy shit, I came here to post this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit, I came here to post this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Part XIII: The Veritas Papers by Jeeps</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/57#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeeps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/57#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Sorry...bad URL paste, try this one:

  http://tinyurl.com/6k3ucp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;bad URL paste, try this one:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6k3ucp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6k3ucp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Part XIII: The Veritas Papers by Jeeps</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/57#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeeps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/57#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Tom Hartmann pointed out some interesting American history on this subject on Air America this past week. I'd completely misunderstood the Boston Tea Party up to this point.

http://tinyurl.com/6k3ucp

((HB))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Hartmann pointed out some interesting American history on this subject on Air America this past week. I&#8217;d completely misunderstood the Boston Tea Party up to this point.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6k3ucp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6k3ucp</a></p>
<p>((HB))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Part XIII: The Veritas Papers by mike</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/57#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/57#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Here's a good article, somewhat relevent, "The Audacity of Depression":  http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2008/04/the-audacity-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a good article, somewhat relevent, &#8220;The Audacity of Depression&#8221;:  <a href="http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2008/04/the-audacity-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2008/04/the-audacity-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PART XII: The Veritas Papers by mike</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/55#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/55#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Regarding the monoculture of the Internet, I agree completely.  It's actually somewhat staggering.  At first, you'd expect the diversity of the net to be overwhelming, but the result is more of an echo chamber.

The biggest thing to keep in mind is that Internet connectivity is largely relegated to the privileged social class.  This is especially so when it comes to high-bandwidth stuff like Youtube.  People like to celebrate the Baghdad blogger, but the vast majority of those plugged-in are privileged, tech-savvy white people; the technocracy.

The mindset of consumption pervades as well; the web browser is designed to be primarily a passive interface to what could otherwise be a powerful connective fiber.  The so-called social networks and media sites are focused entirely on superficial communication.  Real connection, as earlier people may have had around a glowing fire, is absent.  Eventually, we forget about that need entirely, as we fulfill the implanted need to consume.

And our culture is our most valuable export.

The other voices are there, but they are quieter, and more reclusive.  They are the fringe voices in the "real" world, and so they are the fringe of the network.  The fortunate thing is that this medium allows them to communicate despite geographical impediments.  As you say, a tool is neutral, and the user reaps what he sows.

If you want to look at the question, Who profits from all this global trade?  The answer is simple: banks.  Throughout modern history, banks have been trying to profit from every financial interaction between people.  They fund both sides of wars, and profit from the rebuilding costs of the victors.  Governments have given them the ability to *create* money, simply by granting loans... See the "money as debt" video for more.

Banks are the biggest beneficiary of the monster we are trained to praise: exponential growth.  Also, as the various Plunge Protection Teams have recently demonstrated, the governments of the world will bend over backwards to ensure that the banks are not allowed to fall.  Recession is the opposite of growth, and it is therefore bad.  The next logical step, to prevent future crises, will be to nationalize the banking systems of the various countries.  In order to protect "us" from future market turmoil, the governments of the world will somberly take under their purview every facet of wealth creation.

Regarding growth, I submit this excellent presentation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY

"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function."  -- Albert Bartlett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the monoculture of the Internet, I agree completely.  It&#8217;s actually somewhat staggering.  At first, you&#8217;d expect the diversity of the net to be overwhelming, but the result is more of an echo chamber.</p>
<p>The biggest thing to keep in mind is that Internet connectivity is largely relegated to the privileged social class.  This is especially so when it comes to high-bandwidth stuff like Youtube.  People like to celebrate the Baghdad blogger, but the vast majority of those plugged-in are privileged, tech-savvy white people; the technocracy.</p>
<p>The mindset of consumption pervades as well; the web browser is designed to be primarily a passive interface to what could otherwise be a powerful connective fiber.  The so-called social networks and media sites are focused entirely on superficial communication.  Real connection, as earlier people may have had around a glowing fire, is absent.  Eventually, we forget about that need entirely, as we fulfill the implanted need to consume.</p>
<p>And our culture is our most valuable export.</p>
<p>The other voices are there, but they are quieter, and more reclusive.  They are the fringe voices in the &#8220;real&#8221; world, and so they are the fringe of the network.  The fortunate thing is that this medium allows them to communicate despite geographical impediments.  As you say, a tool is neutral, and the user reaps what he sows.</p>
<p>If you want to look at the question, Who profits from all this global trade?  The answer is simple: banks.  Throughout modern history, banks have been trying to profit from every financial interaction between people.  They fund both sides of wars, and profit from the rebuilding costs of the victors.  Governments have given them the ability to *create* money, simply by granting loans&#8230; See the &#8220;money as debt&#8221; video for more.</p>
<p>Banks are the biggest beneficiary of the monster we are trained to praise: exponential growth.  Also, as the various Plunge Protection Teams have recently demonstrated, the governments of the world will bend over backwards to ensure that the banks are not allowed to fall.  Recession is the opposite of growth, and it is therefore bad.  The next logical step, to prevent future crises, will be to nationalize the banking systems of the various countries.  In order to protect &#8220;us&#8221; from future market turmoil, the governments of the world will somberly take under their purview every facet of wealth creation.</p>
<p>Regarding growth, I submit this excellent presentation: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.&#8221;  &#8212; Albert Bartlett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack McCabe: Living life creatively by JackCalvin</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/48#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>JackCalvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/48#comment-53</guid>
		<description>That's a great bio! Your Dad seems like an awesome guy! The apple sure doesn't fall far from the tree, either. ;)  I used to play with Weebles...and I even remember playing with that Weeble airplane!! Pretty cool. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great bio! Your Dad seems like an awesome guy! The apple sure doesn&#8217;t fall far from the tree, either. <img src='http://lizmccabe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I used to play with Weebles&#8230;and I even remember playing with that Weeble airplane!! Pretty cool. <img src='http://lizmccabe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PART IX: The Veritas Papers by Ashley</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/44#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/44#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[I've told both these stories but I'll tell 'em again.]

I was interviewed for a friend's Q clearance once. The last question I was asked was a generic, "Can you think of any reason ________ might be considered an unloyal commie?" Or words to that effect.

I said, "Besides knowing me I can't think of a single bad thing about ________."

She did not find me amusing at all. Perhaps she was in the circle at the CIA in which another friend of mine passed around an essay of mine praising the (original) Kennedy assassination and implicitly favoring more such political action. Somehow, ________ managed to get the clearance anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I've told both these stories but I'll tell 'em again.]</p>
<p>I was interviewed for a friend&#8217;s Q clearance once. The last question I was asked was a generic, &#8220;Can you think of any reason ________ might be considered an unloyal commie?&#8221; Or words to that effect.</p>
<p>I said, &#8220;Besides knowing me I can&#8217;t think of a single bad thing about ________.&#8221;</p>
<p>She did not find me amusing at all. Perhaps she was in the circle at the CIA in which another friend of mine passed around an essay of mine praising the (original) Kennedy assassination and implicitly favoring more such political action. Somehow, ________ managed to get the clearance anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PART VI: The Veritas Papers by Jeeps</title>
		<link>http://lizmccabe.com/archives/36#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeeps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizmccabe.com/archives/36#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I don't think SS is going anywhere regardless of the fear factor machine. 



"If wealth were a worthy goal, Britney would be a happy camper"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think SS is going anywhere regardless of the fear factor machine. </p>
<p>&#8220;If wealth were a worthy goal, Britney would be a happy camper&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
